This article is cited in 4 scientific papers (total in 7 papers)
FROM THE HISTORY OF PHYSICS
The extraordinarily beautiful physical principle of thermonuclear charge design (on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the test of RDS-37 — the first Soviet two-stage thermonuclear charge)
Abstract:
On 22 November 1955, the Semipalatinsk test site saw the test of the first domestic two-stage thermonuclear RDS-37 charge. The charge operation was based on the principle of radiation implosion. The kernel of the principle consists in the radiation generated in a primary A-bomb explosion and confined by the radiation-opaque casing propagating throughout the interior casing volume and flowing around the secondary thermonuclear unit. The secondary unit experiences a strong compression under the irradiation, with a resulting nuclear and thermonuclear explosion. The RDS-37 explosion was the strongest of all those ever realized at the Semipalatinsk test site. It produced an indelible impression on the participants in the test. This document-based paper describes the genesis of the ideas underlying the RDS-37 design and reflects the critical moments in its development. The advent of RDS-37 was an outstanding accomplishment of the scientists and engineers of our country.
Document Type:
Popular science or education materials
PACS:01.65.+g, 28.70.+y
Language: Russian
Citation:
G. A. Goncharov, “The extraordinarily beautiful physical principle of thermonuclear charge design (on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the test of RDS-37 — the first Soviet two-stage thermonuclear charge)”, UFN, 175:11 (2005), 1243–1252; Phys. Usp., 48:11 (2005), 1187–1196
\Bibitem{Gon05}
\by G.~A.~Goncharov
\paper The extraordinarily beautiful physical principle of thermonuclear charge design (on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the test of RDS-37 --- the first Soviet two-stage thermonuclear charge)
\jour UFN
\yr 2005
\vol 175
\issue 11
\pages 1243--1252
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/ufn248}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0175.200511h.1243}
\adsnasa{https://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?2005PhyU...48.1187G}
\transl
\jour Phys. Usp.
\yr 2005
\vol 48
\issue 11
\pages 1187--1196
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.1070/PU2005v048n11ABEH005839}
\isi{https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Publons&SrcAuth=Publons_CEL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000236165700007}
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ufn248
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ufn/v175/i11/p1243
This publication is cited in the following 7 articles:
S. A. Gudin, “Employees of the Institute of Metal Physics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the development of the Soviet Atomic Project”, Phys. Usp., 67:7 (2024), 717–744
Artemov E.T., “Components of Success of the Soviet Atomic Bomb Project”, Her. Russ. Acad. Sci., 90:5 (2020), 548–558
V. I. Ritus, “Work of the Tamm–Sakharov group on the first hydrogen bomb”, Phys. Usp., 57:9 (2014), 903–911
R. I. Ilkaev, “Major stages of the Atomic Project”, Phys. Usp., 56:5 (2013), 502–509
Bernstein J., “John von Neumann and Klaus Fuchs: an Unlikely Collaboration”, Physics in Perspective, 12:1 (2010), 36–50
Gorelik, G, “The Paternity of the H-Bombs: Soviet-American Perspectives”, Physics in Perspective, 11:2 (2009), 169
G. V. Kiselev, “L. D. Landau in the Soviet Atomic Project: a documentary study”, Phys. Usp., 51:9 (2008), 911–954